Needs when it comes to content of this systematic work for the pupil. The part for the manager
The requirements for assessing pupil research
1. The therapy regarding the research. It is necessary that even if with the systemic and integration approaches, it ought to be a work with therapy, without an evident bias in general management, advertising, pedagogy, legislation, philology, etc.
2. The amount of relevance and practical importance of the investigation problems.
3. The degree of elaboration of theoretical product: overview of the literary works, comprehensively showing the developments of domestic and international researchers with this topic. Not just the literature referencing is welcomed, but additionally analysis, contrast and benchmarking the various views of experts, on such basis as that your student formulates the writer’s place.
4. The connection between theoretical and empirical product. Relevance of the investigation susceptible to its content.
5. collection of diagnostic tools and research test.
6. The degree of research outcomes.
7. The degree of interpretation of research outcomes (level of analysis).
8. The amount of guidelines written by the pupil potential audience.
9. Quality of worka��s design.
10. The amount of researcha��s independence. The analysis must certanly be carried out because of the pupil individually, aided by the participation of other individuals only as topics or specialists. Duplication and copying of studies carried out by other writers (plagiarism) is strictly forbidden. The existence of components of separate medical imagination, the formula and reason of their method of solving the debatable dilemmas of this concept and training of therapy, the separate nature of this presentation regarding the generic lipitor and pharmacy, generic lipitor and pharmacy, generic lipitor and pharmacy, generic lipitor and pharmacy, generic lipitor and pharmacy, generic lipitor and pharmacy, generic lipitor and pharmacy, generic lipitor and pharmacy. product therefore the formula of conclusions on the basis of the link between the research are appreciated.
11. innovative approach. You can find subjects being examined in various combinations by students from year to 12 months – they’re not valued. An interesting subject is respected, the choice of revolutionary practices, writer’s practices and just about every other manifestation of imagination. essay-writer.com discount code
Work might be considered unsatisfactory because of the after criteria.
1. Research is maybe perhaps not emotional.
2. The research subject will not match its content.
3. The study had not been carried out or partially carried out. Its answers are maybe perhaps perhaps not prepared or partially prepared. Its email address details are prepared, although not interpreted, or partially interpreted. The theoretical component will not match the empirical.
4. The text regarding the work doesn’t meet up with the demands associated with the design tradition: there is a large number of spelling errors, the text is not modified, sloppy created.
5. The research is a complete or partial plagiarism. In the event that term paper is thought to be unsatisfactory, its gone back towards the pupil for modification.
In the event that pupil didn’t pass the initial protection or the commission discovered the task unsatisfactory, the pupil is certainly not allowed to protect and it is expelled through the college..
Obligations for the manager of term and last qualifying work
Relative to the theme for the term paper or FQW (last qualifying work) manager:
– provides pupil a job to get ready for a phrase paper or a thesis, assists the pupil into the growth of a calendar working arrangements for the whole amount of the FQW;
– advises into the pupil the mandatory fundamental literary works as well as other sources in the theme;
– suggests the pupil regarding the selection of diagnostic tools and drawing up a policy for empirical research
– advises the pupil from the company associated with the research
– recommends the pupil regarding the processing and interpretation of empirical research outcomes
– checks the job in components and also as a complete.
– For FQW writes review to function and recommends the reviewer. The reviewer is preparing overview of the task.
Dates and period of consultations are appointed because of the manager or perhaps the mind for the division. Attention! In the event that pupil didn’t meet up with the due dates set apart because of the dean’s workplace for term paper or FQW, the manager gets the right never to provide solid advice.